70,000 dead in Darfur, but it's not genocide

I wonder what those dead people would've preferred- sure, they might get posthumous justice from the International Criminal Court, but I can't help but wonder if the non-Muslim, non-genocidal residents of Sudan might not have preferred military intervention to UN hand-wringing and UN Bureaucrats pontificating over the 'technical' difference between mass killing and genocide. At least the UN has justified their decision to not take any actual, you know, action that the Security Council was you know, formed for, like preventing genocide, becuase they've proven through advanced use of semantics that no genocide actually took place, just 70,000 individual murders.

U.N. Clears Sudan of Genocide in Darfur